Why it earned this rating
Our assessment
The Teton 10-Year has genuine strengths: a deep crediting menu with participation rates up to 185%, three built-in care waivers with no added fee, and a $10,000 entry point that opens it to buyers most FIAs price out. What holds it to a mixed rating is the carrier. An A.M. Best B on a 10-year commitment is a real structural concern, not a footnote. Most comparable FIAs come from carriers rated A- or better, and that gap is meaningful when you are locking money away for a decade.
The short version
This is a 10-year accumulation FIA from a smaller, lower-rated carrier with an unusually broad index menu and some genuinely useful care features built in at no extra charge. The product mechanics are solid. The issue is that SILAC's B rating from A.M. Best sits below the threshold most advisors and shopping guides treat as a baseline for long-term annuity commitments. A 10-year surrender window is a long time to depend on any carrier's ability to pay — and a B-rated carrier gives you less cushion than most alternatives offer.
Key facts
The full review
Is SILAC Teton 10-Year a Good Annuity?
Depends. The product design itself is genuinely competitive — broad index access, meaningful participation rates, no base fee, and useful care waivers built in. If the carrier carried a stronger rating, this would rate as a good or strong option. The problem is the SILAC A.M. Best B rating. For a 10-year surrender, that matters. Most buyers have access to A-rated or better carriers offering similar products at similar terms. I would not say this is a bad product, but the carrier-risk tradeoff requires honest acknowledgment before anyone commits a decade of savings to it.
Why Someone Would Buy This Annuity
The rational case for the Teton 10-Year starts with access. The $10,000 minimum is well below most FIA floors, which makes this viable for buyers with more modest premiums. The crediting menu is also deeper than what many competitors offer at this tier — six indices, twelve strategies, and participation rates that reach 185% on the RavenPack AI strategy. For a buyer who wants FIA-style accumulation and has already satisfied themselves on the carrier's financial position, this is a product that delivers real features without hidden base fees.
Who This Annuity Is Best For
I think this product best fits a buyer who has already done the work on SILAC's financials and is comfortable with the B rating — perhaps because they are diversifying a portion of savings across multiple carriers, or because their advisor has a specific reason to use SILAC. It is also more appropriate for someone who genuinely values the care waivers: the nursing home, terminal illness, and home health care benefits are substantive and fee-free. Buyers who need maximum confidence in carrier strength, or who expect to surrender early, should look at products from A-rated or better carriers first.
What You're Really Buying Here
You are buying a principal-protected insurance contract tied to index-based crediting formulas. This is not direct market participation — when the indices go down, your account value does not decrease (subject to contract terms). What you gain is participation in upside to whatever cap, participation rate, or spread the contract establishes for your chosen strategy. What you give up is the full raw return of the market, the ability to access your money freely for 10 years, and the comfort of an investment-grade carrier rating. The product is structured as an accumulation vehicle. There is no income rider to convert this to a lifetime income stream later without shopping a separate product.
How the Core Feature Works
The Teton 10-Year offers twelve indexed crediting strategies across six indices, plus a fixed account. The six indices are the S&P 500, Barclays Atlas 5, Bloomberg Versa 10, Nasdaq Generations 5, S&P 500 Duo Swift, and S&P 500 RavenPack Artificial Intelligence. Crediting methods include annual point-to-point with cap, annual point-to-point with participation rate, annual point-to-point with spread, monthly averaging with participation rate, and monthly point-to-point with cap.
The S&P 500 annual point-to-point cap sits at 7.75% based on the October 2025 rate sheet — a moderate figure by market standards. The more interesting numbers are on the proprietary indices: the Barclays Atlas 5 annual strategy carries a 170% participation rate, Nasdaq Generations 5 carries 175%, and the RavenPack AI annual strategy carries 185%. Those participation rates look high, but they are on volatility-controlled indices that are designed to move less than the S&P 500. The practical upside is often more muted than the headline rate suggests. The spread-based strategies on Barclays Atlas 5, Nasdaq Generations 5, and RavenPack AI subtract 3.00-3.25 percentage points from the index return before crediting interest — so in a year where the index gains 4%, a 100% participation rate with a 3% spread credits only 1%.
The fixed account earns 4.25% as of October 2025. That is competitive for a fixed allocation inside an FIA at that point in time, though rates will vary going forward.
Why the Secondary Feature Matters
The most meaningful secondary feature is the set of three care waivers included at no additional charge: a nursing home benefit, a terminal illness benefit, and a home health care benefit. The nursing home benefit allows up to 100% of account value after year one if the annuitant is confined for 90 or more consecutive days to a qualified care facility. The terminal illness benefit similarly allows up to 100% of account value after year one with a life expectancy of 12 months or less. The home health care benefit provides up to 20% of contract value per year for five years if the annuitant cannot perform two of six activities of daily living.
These are not token waivers. For a buyer who is already using a 10-year FIA as part of a broader retirement plan and wants some protection against major health events, these provisions are substantive. They do not turn the product into a care insurance contract, but they reduce the practical sting of the surrender schedule in the scenarios where it matters most.
Liquidity and Surrender Schedule
A 10-year surrender schedule starting at 12% is among the steeper and longer commitments in the FIA market. Most competing 10-year products start in the 9-10% range. The Teton 10-Year starts at 12% for the first two years, drops to 11% in year three, then steps down each year through 2% in year ten. A Market Value Adjustment — MVA — applies on top of surrender charges for most withdrawals during this period, which means your actual exit cost in a rising-rate environment could exceed the stated surrender charge.
The 5% annual free withdrawal after year one provides modest relief. One non-systematic withdrawal per year at 5% of account value will not cover more than routine distributions. RMDs are treated as free withdrawals, which matters for qualified money — you will not be penalized for mandatory distributions.
The optional Elevation riders expand free withdrawal to 10% per year with cumulative carryover up to 30%. That is a material improvement in liquidity flexibility, but it comes with a 0.50% annual fee for Elevation or 1.00% for Elevation Plus. If you are considering those riders primarily for the expanded free withdrawal, think carefully about whether a 0.50-1.00% annual drag on account value is worth the added access.
| Contract Year | Surrender Charge |
|---|---|
| 1 | 12% |
| 2 | 12% |
| 3 | 11% |
| 4 | 10% |
| 5 | 9% |
| 6 | 8% |
| 7 | 7% |
| 8 | 6% |
| 9 | 4% |
| 10 | 2% |
Fees and Tradeoffs
The base contract has no explicit annual fee, which keeps the accumulation story clean. The rider fees — 0.50% for Elevation, 1.00% for Elevation Plus — are optional and only relevant if you elect them at issue. One important detail: both Elevation riders cannot be terminated once elected. If you take Elevation Plus primarily for the 5% premium bonus in year one, you are committing to a 1.00% annual fee for the life of the contract, which could meaningfully erode net credited interest over a decade.
The spread-based strategies act as an embedded fee: crediting = index gain minus spread. On a 3% spread strategy, the index needs to gain more than 3% before any interest is credited to your account. In a flat or mildly positive year, a spread-based strategy credits nothing despite a positive index move. That is structurally similar to paying a fee — it just shows up in how much interest you miss rather than as a direct charge.
Product snapshot
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| Product Type | Fixed Indexed Annuity |
| Surrender Period | 10 years |
| Issue Ages | 0-85 |
| Minimum Premium | $10,000 |
| Indices | S&P 500, Barclays Atlas 5 Index, Bloomberg Versa 10 Index, Nasdaq Generations 5, S&P 500 Duo Swift, S&P 500 RavenPack Artificial Intelligence |
| Crediting Methods | Fixed Interest, Annual Point-to-Point with Cap, Annual Point-to-Point with Participation Rate, Annual Point-to-Point with Spread, Monthly Averaging with Participation Rate, Monthly Point-to-Point with Cap |
| Free Withdrawal | 5% of Account Value after year 1 (one non-systematic withdrawal per year); RMDs allowed from year 1 and treated as free withdrawals even if they exceed 5% |
| MGSV | 87.5% of premiums at 1-3% interest |
| Death Benefit | Full Account Value paid to beneficiary(ies); spousal continuation option available; death benefit paid as long as annuitization has not been elected |
| Income Rider | Not available |
| Premium Bonus | None |
| Availability | Available in AL, AZ, AR, CO, DC, GA, HI, IA, IL, KS, KY, LA, ME, MI, MS, NE, NH, NM, NC, ND, RI, SD, OK, TN, VA, VT, WV, WI, WY plus CA (variation); not approved in NJ or NY. Nursing Home Benefit and Home Health Care Benefit not available in South Dakota. In Idaho, policy form is ELCFIA-ID. In California, licensed as SILAC Life Insurance Company (license #6244-8). Max issue age 85 in Florida is 64. |
Carrier snapshot
Legal Entity: SILAC Insurance Company
A.M. Best Rating: B
SILAC Insurance Company is a regional carrier. Its A.M. Best B rating places it in the "Fair" category — below the B+ (Good) threshold and well below the A- (Excellent) floor that most advisors treat as a baseline for recommending annuities. A B rating does not mean the company is in imminent trouble, but it does reflect a weaker financial position than most carriers issuing comparable fixed indexed annuities. On a 10-year commitment, that gap deserves serious attention. Compare SILAC's rating to the field before committing.
Final take
The Teton 10-Year is a product that would be easier to recommend if it came from a stronger carrier. The mechanics are genuinely solid: a broad index menu, participation rates that can reach 185%, three useful care waivers at no fee, no base contract fee, and a low $10,000 floor. Those are real features that matter to real buyers.
The barrier is the B rating on a 10-year contract. A decade is a long time to depend on any insurer's ability to fulfill its guarantees, and SILAC's below-investment-grade rating should be the first thing any potential buyer scrutinizes carefully. If you are comparing this to products from A- or better carriers and finding similar terms, I think the stronger-rated carrier is usually the right choice. If you have already satisfied yourself on SILAC's financial position, or if you are diversifying across multiple carriers and SILAC is not your primary commitment, the Teton 10-Year has enough to justify a closer look.
