Denali 14-Year review

It depends heavily on your situation. For a buyer who has genuinely discretionary long-term savings, is not relying on this money for income, and wants index-linked growth potential through participation-rate strategies rather than basic capped approaches, there is something real here. For almost everyone else, the 14-year surrender and the B carrier rating are too much to swallow. I think most buyers comparing FIAs will find better fits from A-rated carriers with 10-year or shorter schedules.

The rational case for the Denali 14-Year is a buyer who wants index-linked accumulation over a long horizon and specifically wants access to uncapped participation strategies rather than traditional capped designs. The high participation rates on the specialty indices are genuinely competitive. Someone placing a portion of long-term savings — money they do not plan to touch for retirement income — and who is comfortable with SILAC's financial strength profile might find this worth comparing seriously.

I think this product is best for buyers in their mid-40s to mid-50s who are placing money they will not need until well into retirement, who want accumulation without an income rider they would never use, and who understand that SILAC is a smaller carrier rated B by A.M. Best rather than A or A+. It is not a fit for buyers nearing retirement, anyone who might need the money within 14 years, or anyone who prioritizes carrier financial strength above index menu depth.

You are buying a long-duration, principal-protected insurance contract that credits interest based on the performance of selected indices while protecting against index losses. Critically, you are not getting direct market participation — your upside is defined by participation rates or caps depending on which strategy you pick, and in every case the carrier retains the right to adjust these rates going forward (subject to guaranteed minimums). What makes the Denali 14-Year different from a standard capped FIA is the emphasis on uncapped participation strategies, where the carrier delivers a percentage of the index gain rather than capping it. That is a more transparent structure in some respects, but the participation rates are also adjustable at renewal, so what you see today is not locked in for 14 years.

The Denali 14-Year offers 12 indexed strategies plus a fixed account. The most distinctive options are the uncapped annual participation-rate strategies: Barclays Atlas 5 Index at 210%, Bloomberg Versa 10 Index, Nasdaq Generations 5 at 215%, S&P 500 RavenPack AI at 225%, and S&P 500 Duo Swift. These are low-volatility managed indices rather than the raw S&P 500 — they include internal volatility controls that typically dampen both upside and downside moves compared to the standard index. The high participation rates partly compensate for the lower raw movement of these indices; buyers should understand they are not getting 225% of S&P 500 returns.

For buyers who prefer a simpler approach, there is an S&P 500 annual point-to-point with a 9.75% cap (as of October 2025 rates), a monthly point-to-point capped at 3.25% per month, and a fixed account paying 5.00%. The fixed account is a genuinely useful option inside a long surrender product — in a rising-rate environment, it gives buyers a way to earn a guaranteed rate while retaining the option to shift strategies at renewal.

The waiver provisions — nursing home, terminal illness, and home health care — deserve more attention in a 14-year product than they might in a shorter one. With a 14-year surrender schedule, there is a meaningful chance that a buyer's health circumstances will change during the commitment period. The nursing home benefit allows up to 100% of the account value to be withdrawn after year one if the annuitant is confined to a nursing home for 90 or more consecutive days. The terminal illness benefit allows the same if life expectancy is 12 months or less. The home health care benefit allows up to 20% per year for five years if the annuitant cannot perform two of six activities of daily living. These are real safety valves that reduce the practical risk of the long surrender — not a complete substitute for liquidity, but meaningfully better than nothing.

This is a 14-year annuity. That needs to be stated plainly. The surrender charges run from 14.75% in year one down to 2% in year 14, with an MVA — Market Value Adjustment — that can push the effective penalty higher or lower depending on interest rate movements. A rising-rate environment means an MVA that typically works against the seller, adding to the effective surrender cost.

The free withdrawal provision is 5% of account value per year after year one — meaningfully lower than the 10% that most competing FIAs allow. That is another constraint worth noting. Buyers using the optional Elevation or Elevation Plus riders get a 10% free withdrawal (up to 30% cumulative if no withdrawals were taken the prior year), but those riders carry their own costs. RMDs attributable to the contract are allowed in year one, which helps for IRA money, but the narrow free-withdrawal window means buyers with other liquidity needs should think hard before committing.

The base contract has no annual fee. The optional Elevation rider adds a 0.50% annual spread on account value (capped at annual interest credited), and Elevation Plus adds 1.00%. These riders expand the free withdrawal from 5% to 10% — a meaningful liquidity improvement — but the drag on credited interest can be significant in years when the index doesn't perform well, since the fee is capped at what was actually credited.

There is also a Fixed and Indexed Gain Recapture Schedule. On withdrawals subject to surrender charges, gains above the free-withdrawal amount are recaptured on a declining schedule: 100% of gains in year one, stepping down to 10% in year 14, then zero thereafter. This is a second layer of friction on top of the surrender charge itself, and it complicates the math for buyers who might consider a partial surrender in the middle years.

Legal Entity: SILAC Insurance Company

A.M. Best Rating: B

SILAC Insurance Company is a smaller regional carrier. A B rating from A.M. Best indicates adequate financial strength but falls below the A- floor that many financial advisors use as a minimum threshold. That does not mean SILAC is imprudent or unsafe — many B-rated carriers have long operating histories — but it does mean the safety margin is thinner than you would get from an A or A+ carrier. Buyers placing a meaningful portion of retirement savings should understand this tradeoff.